Karl

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

Karl

Joined

·
55 Posts

every time without, a doubt

Joined

·
798 Posts

Joined

·
591 Posts

Joined

·
798 Posts

Yes, I have and they work great. The ones I have are made by Crooked Horn and they are called the Slide-Flex System. They stretch a little

Joined

·
798 Posts

Joined

·
8,459 Posts

Joined

·
55 Posts

A Mil is a Milliradian, which means it subtends one yard of the circumference of a 1000 yard radius circle, or one metre of a circle of 1000m radius. More practical is to remember a Mil equals 3.6” at 100yds or 10cm at 100m, and increases by 3.6”/10cm for every 100yds/100m of range.

An even more useful thing to remember is that a Mil is half a metre at 500m. Half a metre can be taken as approximating a man’s shoulder width, so if a human figure appears one Mil across they are at 500m. A figure 2 Mils across would be at 250m, a figure ¾ Mil across would be at 750m and a figure ¼ Mil across would be at 2,000m

The idea of the Mildot system is that it acts as a sort of ruler. You look at an object of known size, compare it to the Mildot scale, and then use this formulae to find the range.

Each Mil-dot on a scope reticle is ¼ Mil, the distance between the centres of the dots is 1Mil and the distance between the edges of the dots is ¾ Mil

Range (metres or yards) = [Target size (metres or yards) x 1000] / Size in Mils

OR

Range (in 1000s of metres or yards) = [Target size (metres or yards)] / Size in Mils

If a man is assumed to be 6ft (2yds) tall, and appears 5 Mils high, then 2000/5 = 400yds. Distance from belt buckle to crown can be assumed to be half his height, so for the previous example 1000/2.5 = 400yds. When dealing with a 0.5 Mil value it is probably easier to double both figures i.e. treat 2000/2.5 as 4000/5. Likewise quadriple 0.25 and 0.75 values. 1000/3.75 = 4000/15 = 266.7 yards.

Not a complicated formula, but also not one to try and do in your head in the field when under stress. Also, six footers are not average, even in Western Society. Average male height is around 5’ 8” in socks, and female 5’ 3”. 5’ 9” is about 1.9yds, 5’ 6” about 1.8yds and 5’ 3” 1.75yds. This makes the maths a little harder to do in your head.

My solution –have a cheat sheet.

You may not agree with the features I’ve selected, or the dimensions may be off for the targets you are likely to encounter. The average height of someone in Asia probably is quite a bit less than 5’9”.

To allow for this the cheat sheet is an Excel document with embedded formulae. All you have to do is decide the size of the object you want to use as a reference, and divide this by the number of inches or cms per Mil at 100yrds, or 100m, depending on which units you are using. These figures are found in cells B2 and B3.

For example:-

11” long rabbit. 11/3.6 =3.06 Mil at 100yds

75 cm high target 75/10 = 7.5 Mil at 100m

Once you have this Mil value, enter it into B10-16 on either the Yards or Metres sheet (make sure you have not calculated the size at 100yds if you are using the Metres sheet). When you enter this value the sheet will calculate the rest of the table automatically. B15 and B16 have been left blank so you can add your own values.

It may also be possible to create a nomograph so that you can place a straight edge between the column for the object actual size and that for the size in Mils and read off the range. However, the on-line nomograph drawing programs I have tried have not given me anything comprehensible.

There is another way to use the Millirad system. Hold your arm out straight, elbow locked, palm up with one or more fingers raised.

Look at the finger with one eye closed.

The width of your first finger is approximately 30 Mils, the first and second fingers together 70 Mils, three fingers 100 Mils and four fingers 125 Mils.

This method is most useful for large objects such as vehicles. A tank can be assumed to be 10 feet wide and 20 feet long. 30 Mils is equivalent to 10ft at 100 metres.

Much simpler is to estimate the target's speed in Metres per second in the first place. Bear in mind that an estimate is exactly that, and does not need to be to four decimal places accuracy. Estimate the speed in metres. If you need to treat a foot of movement as 0.3 or a third of a metre, two foot as 0.6 or two thirds and so on. Not a mathematically accurate equivalent but close enough for these purposes.

Another good tip is to start thinking of you bullet flight times as fractions rather than decimals. Most of us find it far easier to multiply the target speed by a half or 3/10ths than by 0.5 or 0.3. For a fraction of 10 the trick is simple:-multiply by the top number and then knock a zero off the result (move the decimal point one to the left).

A target is estimated moving at 1.6m/s and the time of flight for that range is 0.4 sec?

1.6 x 4 = 6.4

6.4 divided by 10 is 0.64

Lead is therefore 0.64 metres, which is about 2/3rds of a yard or 2 ft.

If you can observe the target through a Mil-dot scale you can do things even quicker. Place the crosshairs on the target and count one second (“one thousand and one”). Note how far along the Mil scale the target moved and multiply by the fractional bullet time of flight to get the lead in Mils.

Example, a target moves 4 Mils at second. TOF is 4/10ths.

4 x 4 = 16

16 divided by 10 is 1.6 Mils.

Aim a shade over a Mil and a half ahead of the target.

QUOTE=Hunting Man;40491]I haven't got a new set yet but 8x42's seem to be a good compromise. I spent about an hour at Cabela's looking through several brands. i thought the 6X30's might be best for archery but I can't afford two so the 8X42 probably will get the nod. I have 7X50 Tasco Marine bino's that I like to keep in the truck just in case. A friend of mine brought them back from the Marines, they have the graduations for verticle/horizional use, something I never needed or figured out.[/QUOTE]

I got out of the habit after putting some small dents in the top of the butt stock on my Ruger No 1 during my first Elk hunt. I had no problem when walking, but in Idaho it seemed like we were always going up (yea I know it's impossible to always be going up). My binos would start swinging then bonk into the butt stock. That was a great justification by onehorse for carrying them on MN hunts I never have tried the shifting focus technique, but I will now. I always thought that unless I was counting points as a trophy hunter I didn't need them in the woods here in MN. I become focused on whether I have a unobstructed shot into the boiler room if I see horns. I personally love my Zeiss 8x30 armored binos but they are a little heavy, I haven't tried one of the chest attachment systems. Thanks again for the input everyone....

Karl

G

Joined

·
1,524 Posts

I always have them in my hand

I am guilty of taking way to much stuff into the woods

I am guilty of taking way to much stuff into the woods

Joined

·
8,459 Posts

Joined

·
8,459 Posts

I think its the same thing??

Joined

·
55 Posts

if i'm reading all the verbiage right you can do the same thing with a variable power scope with duplex reticules to get a range on the target

Joined

·
798 Posts

Joined

·
55 Posts

Joined

·
798 Posts

Sounds like you have more knowledge and experience than most of us. Hope this didn't sound like I was doubting that. I just posted this suggestion for anyone who cared to check it out as it is quite simple and very effective.

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

Join the discussion

Deer Hunting Forums

A forum community dedicated to deer hunters and hunting enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about safety, gear, tips, tricks, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, reviews, reports, accessories, classifieds, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums

Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!